News

Immobilized

A pre-schooler in the West Hartford public school system is made to wear a weight vest for being too wiggly

Comments (39)
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Sandra and Samantha Rodriguez.

Samantha Rodriguez was hanging her 3-year-old son's backpack on its hook at Aiken Elementary School in West Hartford two weeks ago when she heard his teacher's voice coming from behind her.

"She told me, ‘By the way, we used a weight vest on [your son] yesterday,'" said Rodriguez of the teacher, Ann Sullivan.

Rodriguez didn't know how to respond. Stunned, she asked exactly what was a weight vest? Pointing to some smocks the children wear for art, Sullivan said it looked like those, only it had weights in it "to weigh him down so he can stay sitting longer."

Rodriguez's son didn't want to sit still for "circle time," explained Sullivan. He was "wiggly" and didn't always listen well and the weight vest helped him. Rodriguez says the conversation took place in front of other parents dropping their children off - none of whose children had worn the weight vest. Humiliated and near tears, Rodriguez, 21, walked away without responding.

"It was sad because [my son] was the only one who had that used on him," said Rodriguez.

When, a short while later that day, Samantha's mother Sandra Rodriguez heard what had happened to her grandson, she immediately called the Board of Education to complain, leaving a message for Timothy Dunn, assistant superintendent for administration. Then she and Samantha jumped in the car and headed back to Aiken.

"I went straight to the teacher and waited for everybody to leave," said Sandra. "She was pale as a ghost when she saw us. I said, ‘I need to speak to you in private.' She said, ‘I know.'"

According to Sandra, the principal, Kathleen Rotchford-McKay, soon joined the trio and they went to her office to talk. Rodriguez and her daughter had never met Rotchford-McKay before, but recognized her as the woman they saw through a window, playing with Samantha's son, when they arrived.

Sandra says Rotchford-McKay apologized to her and her daughter for what had happened, and said the vest, which the principal described as an "occupational therapy device,"  would not be used on Samantha's son again.

Sullivan had something covered in brightly colored fabric crumpled at her feet. Would they like to see the vest? Sandra told them to get it out of the room before she did something she regretted.

"Why didn't you just tie him to a tree? It's the same thing," she remembered saying.

School officials declined to comment on the Rodriguezes' account of events.

Weighted vests are in fact used in therapy for autistic children, or children with sensory integration disorder - a condition that makes them uncomfortable with things like fluorescent lights, or the texture of their food - according to David Medina, spokesman for Hartford Public Schools.

Medina said the vests are used in the Hartford school system, but only with the parents' consent and only when prescribed by an occupational therapist. He said experts describe the effect of the vest, when used properly, as "like being hugged."

"It's a heavy coat with lead weights," said Medina. "It's not meant as a punishment and it's only to be applied for 15 minutes, approximately."

Susan Avena, a visiting assistant professor of psychology at Trinity College in Hartford, confirmed that the pressure of a weight vest can be soothing to children with autism or other disorders.

"Autism in general is not well understood, but think of it in terms of children not being able to filter out stimulation," said Avena. "They engage in behaviors to soothe that, repetitive behaviors like spinning the wheel of a toy truck over and over. Focusing in on one stimulus feels good to them. My understanding is that the pressure of a weight vest does the same thing, eliminating some of the stimuli."

Sandra Rodriguez says her grandson is not autistic or being treated for any other disorder. He did have speech therapy for a short time, she says, but that ended when it was decided he was simply a "very quiet little boy."

As for being wiggly, Avena says that's to be expected.

"Three-year-olds wiggle. You can't expect them to sit still all the time," said Avena. "You have to design the classroom around the idea that 3-year-olds have a short attention span and limits to the control they have over their energy. Punishment for not being able to sit still at this age is not appropriate."

By the end of the meeting that day at Aiken, Sandra Rodriguez says Ann Sullivan had tears in her eyes. She says Sullivan tried to hug her, but that she turned her away.

"I said, ‘Don't touch me,' and we left," she said.

That evening, Sandra says she received a call from Dunn, who said he was going to get to the bottom of the matter. Dunn's subsequent explanation that the vest was a "therapeutic occupational device" did little to calm Sandra's anger. But Dunn did respond quickly to the incident, and arranged for her grandson to be transferred to Whiting Lane School, where he had already attended summer school and was familiar with the teachers and other children.

"I feel that [Dunn] was fair. He resolved this in a professional manner," Sandra said. "He did the best he could with our story."

Dunn told the Advocate he was unable to comment for this story because of privacy considerations. He did confirm that, like Hartford schools, West Hartford schools use weight vests as therapy.

Returning home from school on a recent afternoon, Sandra's grandson had no trouble talking to me, marching over to shake my hand and say hello before settling in next to his grandmother to munch on french fries. Soon he left to play upstairs in the West Hartford home where he lives with his mother, uncle and grandparents.

"He was immobilized in front of all his peers. I can't imagine what he was thinking," Sandra said. "I keep asking him, but he doesn't know. He loves school. He probably doesn't understand what happened to him."

 

 

More News Articles
Birth of a Blowhard:  Did Glenn Beck hatch his plan to become a right-wing radio megastar right here on Connecticut's airwaves?
Republicans Overtweet:  Twitter shuts down 33 fake accounts created by state Republicans in an attempt to lambast Dems

Comments (39)
Post a Comment
As a teacher of eleven years I have seen a weight vest used in many situations. It is nothing like being tied to a tree. I do know that it is difficult for parents when there child requires special modifications in order to be successful in school. That is not the teachers fault.
Posted by David Bocchichio on 10.21.09 at 15.25
David Bocchichio... are you flipping insane? How about you wear one of those devices equivalent in ratio to your weight? See how you like it.
This is unbelievably cruel to a 3 year old. What the heck is wrong with you that you think that this is ok to do?
How is being weighted down going to make this 3 year old successful? If anything, it would zap his youthfulness right out of him.
Three year old are SUPPOSED to be wiggly!
Why not put the kids in shackles or strait jackets?
Egads - anyone reading this article really ought to seriously consider homeschooling ... Government schools and preschools have become virtual prison camps.
Posted by Judy Aron on 10.21.09 at 21.16
>>I do know that it is difficult for parents when there child requires special modifications in order to be successful in school

A three year old kid??

Judy's right; it's not only insane but I thank heavens my boy's 21 now for if some poor fool tried a stunt like that *ever* with my son I'd probably have gotten myself locked up, and I doubt I'd be out yet!
Posted by Douglas C Hageman on 10.21.09 at 21.30
That teacher needs to be tied down see how she likes it. (Stupid ass) I would off smacked her. she well deseved it. I will be dam if they do something like this to my child
Posted by Pissed off parent on 10.22.09 at 9.11
Seriously???? A weighted vest for a 3year old?? That IS insane. Aside from the fact that the attention of a 3 yr old is not lengthy by any stretch what exactly does this teach the child about different ways to be calm. Oh let's just have this bigger than me person throw some heavy weights on me and force me to not move! Kind of falls inline with "Might makes Right"???? I think not. Just shameful.
Posted by WhisperingWind on 10.22.09 at 13.25
what an idiot that teacher is... I can just picture her crying, while offering a hug, and it just makes me laugh. the dumbass!
Posted by ms. v on 10.22.09 at 13.26
My heart breaks for this child. Just wrong.
Posted by Debbie on 10.22.09 at 13.38
I think your comments are ridiculous. How would you know how to treat a child that clearly has special needs? I think the people that responded to this above are very narrowminded, and you probably don't even know anything weighted vests and how it is an approved device to help checked with special needs. Hvae you thought about a little research? She didn't lie and told the parents. All they had to do is say they did not want that method used on their child and it would never have been done again. They are making a big deal out of something that could have been resolved in one conversation. If you are going to blame everyone else for your childs issues, he will always have issues.
Posted by someone with a brain on 10.22.09 at 13.56
I am surprised the Advocate would bother printing an article about the use of an approved device simply because the family didn't bother to take the time to understand its use. If the vest helped their child they have done him a disservice by blocking its use. And moving the child to another school is avoidance not problem resolution.
Posted by KT on 10.22.09 at 14.31
The weighted vests DO NOT immobilzed a child. They are usually only 3-5 pounds of balanced (front and back) weight. These vests were absolutlely imperitive for my son in his early childhood years at school. The stimulus that the child receives from the vest dampens the other stimulation that would otherwise distract the child. I have never heard of it being used on a "regular education" child, only on "special education" children with certain disorders. But, I can certainly understand why a teacher might have thought if it worked on one, why not try it on another. The vest does not hurt the child, and for some, its the only way to get a decent enough attention span to teach the child.
Posted by sarah on 10.22.09 at 14.56
The article does not state if the child has special needs or is in a regular education setting. But considering the child is three and in a public school I have to assume he is special needs. The weighted vest is appropriate in certain instances for children with special needs. I notice the article does not mention the experience of the teacher or if anyone at the school backed her in her decision. It seems to me you are writing an article based on emotion, without much fact behind it and clearly without doing much research. I feel sorry for the teacher and the abuse she is taking from this situation. She used an accepted method and never hurt the child.
Posted by LD on 10.22.09 at 15.57
Weighted vests are NOT punishments...and can be used on any child as a calming device. Next time you are at the dentist getting xrays and they put the lead blanket over you, you will see how calming it is to have that extra weight on you.

This teacher, Sullivan, was trying her best to help a child, and the parent is refusing the help. Why is this even newsworthy?
Posted by AM on 10.22.09 at 16.03
I am disappointed that The Advocate would publish an article so clearly misleading. The use of a weighted vest is a fantastic tool to CALM a child and help them to attend, not to restrain or immobilize the child. The fact that the family is uninformed is no excuse for the author to be as well. This poor teacher deserves quite an apology from The Advocate, the family and her school principal who clearly failed to explain why and how the vest is used with children who have trouble self-regulating. An informed article on sensory integration therapy and an a written apology to the teacher who was so unfairly attacked, not to mention named in this article, would be a great place to start..
Posted by Stephanie S. on 10.22.09 at 18.22
This article exemplifies so much of what is wrong with society today ~ and I do not mean what "happened" to this child. The use of a weighted vest (not "weight vest", as it was mistakenly referred to throughout the article save one instance) is a safe, research-based, approved method of helping children with sensory (and other) issues focus; it is by NO MEANS a method of punishment or cruelty. Did this mother ever bother to ask what the result of the use of the vest was on her son? Did she ask him or did she immediately jump to a misinformed conclusion? This article is disgraceful; the editors of The Advocate should be ashamed for allowing such a poorly written and researched article to be printed. I agree with an earlier comment ~ you owe it to the readers, public educators, occupational therapists, students, parents, and ABOVE ANYONE ELSE, Ms. Sullivan to apologize for such misinformation and you should provide a well-researched article about the purpose and appropriate use of weighted vests within the classroom setting. As not only an educator myself, but the parent of a special needs student, I am most disturbed that such gross misinformation is allowed to be circulated. This mother and grandmother need to get their facts straight as well so they can HELP SUPPORT this child and his needs throughout his educational career. The proper use of the weighted vest would do him a great deal of good if only the ignorance of the parent did not get in the way. I hope the WH public schools knows enough to support Ms. Sullivan and in the future not be bullied by misinformed parents. I am also disheartened by the comments of Trinity professor Susan Avena; either she was misrepresented or is grossly misinformed for a professor of psychology; use of a weighted vest is by no means punishment. I am completely disgusted by this article; I hope The Advocate will rectify what they have done by publishing a new article with correct, appropriate information about this topic. The public is misinformed enough as is evidence by many of the inane comments posted about this article ; don't make it worse.
Posted by Disheartened Educator on 10.23.09 at 4.51
I think people are being a tad too harsh. I feel they introduced the weighted vest well and the reader can do more research if they are so inclined. I am a teacher and honestly the teacher messed up and should have talked to the parents first but she didn't harm the child. It was just poor judgment.
Posted by shelly on 10.23.09 at 13.39
The advocate did many children a disservice by printing misinformation. How sad for this child that he will no longer have Ms. Sullivan for a teacher. The family should be searching for ways to help the child. Their time would have been better spent learning about a weighted vest.
Posted by CP on 10.23.09 at 15.32
The Advocate did a disservice not only to the classroom teacher, but also to special needs children whose parents are learning about the theraputic tools available. Weighted vests are a common theraputic device in preschool special needs classrooms. These vests provide deep pressure to the muscles and joints, which, according to sensory integration theory, allows children to calm down and become better organized. When children are focused, they are better able to learn and play.

This is nothing like tying a child to a tree.

There are a lot of unproven therapies out there for children with special needs - and a lot of unscrupulous providers willing to take desperate parents' money for therapies that don't work. A weighted vest, on the other hand, is a widely accepted therapeutic device - not a source of outrage.
Posted by Susan on 10.24.09 at 13.32
This article is unfortunate and definitely misinforms the reader. Over the past 10 years, I have done a great deal of research about sensory processing disorder and various therapies and treatment approaches. I also have a great deal of experience working with children who have challenges with sensory processing, behaviors, and attention. Weighted vests are a common tool used to help children calm their bodies and provide a balanced integration of sensory stimuli received through the 7 sensory systems, particularly when their sensory systems are not naturally able to do so. When used correctly they are quite effective and beneficial, and children with sensory processing challenges tend to prefer to wear the vests because it helps them focus and keep their bodies calm. They should never be used to restrain movement and should never be used as punishment, but it doesn't sound like this teacher did any of this - she sounds like she used it appropriately. An occupational therapist should be consulting about a child who would use one, and it should also be written in the child's Individualized Education Plan (IEP) with parent knowledge of this before it is used - this may have been this teacher's downfall. Regardless, it is sad that The Advocate reported this case in this manner without adequate research. A great book for further information about sensory processing and treatment approaches is The Out-of-Sync Child by Carol Stock Kranowitz.
Posted by teacher on 10.24.09 at 15.04
where does it say that this child has special needs. nowhere. and beside who gave the teacher the right to that. did she ask the parent. nooooooooooooo. i would have punch that teacher. O yeah i know i would have been lock up. some of you would say what good would that do. but if you kids you would understand.
Posted by lani on 10.24.09 at 20.17
This is article is outrageous. A weighted vest is not in any way immobilizing. It is like wearing a vest with sand in the pockets. it is regularly used and children like it. In fact, those not wearing it want to try it. it gives them a sense of their body in space. I taught Sp.Ed for 35 yrs. and there was never a problem when vest were used.. I have also taught with this teacher who is the kindest, loving, most well- informed teacher I know. If she tried this vest, it wasn't for just "wiggling. " She is always thoughtful of parents . This article was awful and she should be given an apology and West hartford Schools should be stronger in backing her up. I've never seen a child who was embarrassed by this vest- only comforted. Please investigate thoroughly brfore you jump to conclusions and ruin a teacher's reputation. I thought that what was reporters did.
Posted by CD on 10.25.09 at 3.28
Lani - The article doesn't need to say that the child has special needs. When a child is 3 years old and enrolled in the public school system, this strongly leads to the conclusion that the child has special needs - that is how they get enrolled in the public school system at that age. On one hand, the teacher should have discussed this with the parent before utilizing this strategy, however on the other hand, perhaps the parent should have found out more about the method before jumping to conclusions and becoming so enraged. Now, as a result of all of this, the child may be missing out on a strategy that could have been quite useful, the parent comes off looking like a hot-head, the Advocate reporters look like idiots, the teacher looks bad, the school district looks like they'll do anything to cover problems with bandaids, etc, etc. This article seems as if it could have been reported in a more tactful manner with some research behind it; perhaps not painting a picture of this poor teacher as a monster who immobilized a child with a lead vest.
Posted by D on 10.25.09 at 6.18
As a special educator, I am saddened to read this article as it misrepresents this teacher's efforts in helping this child be more regulated and ready to learn. The family clearly was emotional and failed to listen with an open ear and mind how a weighted vest (which is not harmful nor a punishment! Why would they be used in a public school setting if they were?) could help this child. Weighted vests are not used for children who are just "wiggly" - as said in previous comments, more research should have been done by this family and the Advocate. This matter could have clearly been settled within the school and not sensationalized in such a harmful way against the good intentions of this special educator. This teacher clearly had this child's best interest in mind and it is sad that she is portrayed otherwise! Jumping the gun and calling a reporter is not the best way this matter (or any matter) could have been settled and misinforms families of children with special needs and creates unneeded aprehensions! I hope this teacher continues to support and do what's best for her students. I believe parents should be partners in the education of their children... work TOGETHER not against each other.
Posted by kristen on 10.25.09 at 6.24
I have been an early childhood special education teacher for over 19 years, and have often used weighted vests on 3 and 4 year old students as part of an intervention. As stated in many previous comments, a weighted vest can be beneficial for students who exhibit difficulty with sensory integration, hyperactivity, and/or poor body awareness. Other students in my class have also wanted to wear a weighted vest (weighted lap pad, pillow, turtle, snake, etc.) because they liked the "feeling" it provided them. The "weighted" part of such items can be likened to carrying a few bean bags in one's pockets. It is by no means a way to restrict a child's movement and definately does not "immobilize" anyone or act as a punishment.

I support Ms. Sullivan in her effort to provide for the individual needs of her students. While Ms. Sullivan may have erred in not properly informing the parent about the use of this intervention (not sure if this is the case, since the article's informant was the parent/grandparent involved), I think that the parent made a bigger mistake by not taking the time to learn about what this teacher was actually trying to do to help her child.
Posted by Early Childhood Teacher on 10.25.09 at 13.03
In response to Disheartened Educator. In no instance did I say or imply that this child was being punished with the weighted vest. I was asked it weighted vests were used for punishment. I stated that weighted vests are not used as standard practice for discipline or student management. However, some children with sensory integration difficulties may benefit from them under the right circumstances. First, the child would need to be evaluated and diagnosed with a sensory problem. Then a treatment plan would be put in place including a meeting at which the parent or guardian consents to the use of the weighted vest and the conditions under which it would be used. The child should also be informed of its use in a developmentally appropriate way (at his level of understanding).
Posted by Susan Averna on 10.25.09 at 17.19
I worked inb a state owned mental hospital. Adults don't have the right to be manic (happiness) or have paranoia (fearful). According to them the psych pros are all right and the public is all wrong. It stinks!!!
Posted by old and dying on 10.26.09 at 11.05
Ms. Sullivan used sound judgement in her classroom to help a child maintain his attention and focus during a classroom lesson time. School is not always a place where the real world skills arrive with a child, but are learned by a caring early childhood educator. It is my hope that the parents who clearly overreacted will remember that this child will grow up and have many life experiences. I dont' even consider this life experience a terrible one. Mom & grandma ran in and took care when this child needed to learn to be responsible and it looks like the teacher in charge did what needed to be done -helped the child understand what needed to be done. Shame on anyone who doubts that the teacher had anything but the best interest of the child in mind that day. I have seen countless teachers use vests as well as adults in training to be firefighters. Now we all have to watch our backs to make sure parents don't run to the ADVOCATE with a half a story.
Posted by 55 yr old Kindergarten Teacher on 10.26.09 at 15.38
"He was immobilized in front of all his peers. I can't imagine what he was thinking," Sandra said. "I keep asking him, but he doesn't know. He loves school. He probably doesn't understand what happened to him."

Or maybe he just doesn't understand why everyone is making a big fuss about something that clearly didn't make an impression on him, let alone "harm" him.
Posted by Dan on 10.27.09 at 11.20
Ann Sullivan is my sister and I have to say I was disgusted by the article. I do not know all the details of what happened but I can tell you this. With a little research on the web, which I did myself, I found out the only pre-school program that is at Aiken is an early learning center and there services include:

consultation to parents and/or community-based preschools
observations and evaluations of preschoolers pertaining to one or more developmental areas of concern. (I found this right on theri website although I did not list the servies)

This was not mentioned in the article and very easy to resarch... It never mentioned that Ann Sullivan has a masters degree and other desigations and has been a teacher of special needs (specifically pre-schoolers) for over twenty years.

It does not mention any research studies on weighted vests and how that they can be approprate in certain situations.

As the article states, she did tell the parent that she used a weighted vest once, so it is not like she kept it a secret. It does say the the parent reacted and was unwilling to learn or didn't care to investiagte what this treament entailed. It is pretty easy to google information on it and before you say she may not have a computer, library's in West Hartford are connected to the interent and residents can use them. It also states that the principle and Ann said that if the parent did not not want them to use it agian, they would not.

So this is research that could have been easlity done, and why did the parent feel the need to escalate it without doing any research? Why did she call the superintendent and reach out to the advocate when it was already resolved? Also, why did the advocate choose to write an article that was based on feeling and had very little facts included?

I do agree with one of the comments against my sister above. I do feel sorry for the child. He has now been removed from a classroom where he could have worked with my sister. She is a dedicated, knowledgable teacher who always advocates on befalf of parents and children and now he will never get the opportunity to work with such a wonderful dedicated person.

Posted by Laura on 10.28.09 at 7.46
I have limited experience with IEP's but I thought a child was assessed and tested by his teacher and appropriate special educators to determine needs and possible methods and tools that would help the child. Finding the methods and tools for each child would be to some extent be trial and error. Then the IEP would be written up stating the plan to help this child.
Since the child is about 3 and a half it is likely he recently moved from the state's birth to 3 program for children with special needs. So this would be his first year in the school system. My guess is the use of the weighted vest was part of the assessment process. Assesment does not happen in a matter of a few days. It takes time and cooperation from a number of very well educated people. The Advocate and Daniel D'Ambrosio have done a very poor job of reporting in this article.
Posted by KT on 10.29.09 at 6.50
Where to begin...
This article was obviously poorly researched, and the newspaper should do right by their readers and print another article that has some scientific research backing it, not just emotion. If only the author could have taken the time to interview an occupational therapist that has experience with children who have sensory processing difficulties and have prescribed the use of weighted modalities to help calm the central nervous system and increase attention/focus.
I feel that this article is such a disservice to parents, educators, and especially children out there who benefit greatly from weighted vests. Instead of helping this mother and grandmother understand their child and grandchild better, all that has been done is to disrupt this child's life and slander a public school teacher. This teacher sounds as though she was assessing if there was a benefit to him using the weighted vest in order to increase his body in space awareness and increase his focus/listening skills. Do we know if an OT had been consulted or involved...the article fails to mention this.
Misinformation is an injustice to the public, and writers need to be more aware of what information they are putting out there, and do better research!
Posted by AW on 10.29.09 at 8.58
Judy,Judy,Judy,calm down. Let's look at the facts,he calmed down ,had no ill effects & life goes on except for the hysterical or worse. My flak jacket weighed a ton but didn't calm me down.
Posted by ricbee on 10.29.09 at 14.27
The use of weighted vests for children with sensory processing problems is an established and researched strategy used by occupational therapists. It is NOT a punishment, nor does it immobilize a child. It is slightly weighted....and never the same weight as the child. Some weighted vests have about 1 -2 pounds of added weight which is much lighter than most children's backpacks. In many cases the backpack can be used in the same way as a weighted vest. The extra weight is calming for many people (not just children) just as a massage can be calming, a hot bath can be calming, getting your scalp washed by your hairdressor can be calming etc. Pressure to the skin is a calming input for many people and the weighted vest provides extra pressure to the skin and also extra input into the child's muscles and joints as he walks around with it on. This is the same kind of calming input that others get with weightlifting, running or jogging, or jumping on a trampoline for example. Our bodies naturally seek out sensory inputs. For kids that need movement (wiggly kids) sometimes adding the extra weight helps them get the extra input that their body needs and this allows them to pay attention to other things. It is too bad that the teacher used it without discussing it with the parent first and without having an occupational therapists explain it- but it did not harm the child and many children not only like the vest but ask to wear it.

Here is one abstract from one research paper on the use of weighted vests....

Am J Occup Ther. 2001 Nov-Dec;55(6):621-8.

The use of a weighted vest to increase on-task behavior in children with attention difficulties.
VandenBerg NL.

Plainwell Community Schools, Plainwell, Michigan, USA. vanden4@aol.com

OBJECTIVE: Children described as having attention deficit hyperactivity disorder often demonstrate inability to sustain visual attention during classroom fine motor activities. This study investigated the effect of wearing a weighted vest (deep-pressure sensory input) on children's on-task behavior in the classroom. METHOD: Four students with documented attention difficulties and hyperactivity were timed with a stopwatch to measure their on-task behavior during fine motor activities in the classroom. All 4 students were timed for six 15-min observations without wearing a weighted vest and for six 15-min observations while wearing a weighted vest. RESULTS: On-task behavior increased by 18% to 25% in all 4 students while wearing the weighted vest. Additionally, 3 of the 4 students frequently asked to wear the vest other than during the observation times. CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings support the hypothesis that wearing a weighted vest to apply deep pressure increases on-task behavior during fine motor activities.

PMID: 12959226 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Posted by HMK on 11.1.09 at 2.24
This article and the responses that support it just reinforce the need this society has for better education to current practices, tools, their effectiveness and actual use. Working in a preschool with 3 &4 year olds, it is most certain that this teacher had not just tried this because the child was wiggly. I support previous comments that this teacher is owed an appology and west hartford schools should be more supportive in backing here. Perhaps schools should have more in house education so that all levels of administration can better nunderstand the tools and strategies used within that environment to help our children to better access their education. Concerned Therapist
Posted by PZ on 11.1.09 at 5.26
Wow - I feel for the teacher who only thought she was doing something to help this child. The teacher should have talked to the parent first but this mother obviously over reacted. She wasn't willing to try to understand what was used and why.The teacher tried a strategy to help her son - the other kids could sit for circle time so why not this kid? His behvavior must have been keeping him and the other kids from participating. Although this mother should have been consulted first, she should have taken the time to understand why it was used. Or maybe she, herself, is not capable of this level of understanding.
Posted by Can't believe the over reaction on 11.1.09 at 6.40
I am a special education teacher for the under 5 crowd. Working with occupational therapists and physical therapists, I have seen weighted vests (never weighing more than 3-5 lbs) used successfully - but always with parents' permission. Weighted vests are a therapeutic intervention - not a behavioral device. What the teacher did was wrong, and the family could no longer trust her. I'm sure they were wondering 'this is what she told us she was doing... what's going on that she isn't telling us about?' Imagine if that teacher had received permission first - this whole incident could have been resolved much more positively.
Posted by Pam on 11.1.09 at 14.30
I am confused as to what the big deal is.

To summarize: a mother enrolls her 3-year-old son in West Hartford's highly-regarded pre-school program at Aiken (note: there's a long waiting list for this program). The mother is informed by the teacher that a "weighted vest," an approved and accepted occupational therapy device, had been used on her son the previous day. The mother (and grandmother) were not happy about this; however, after meeting with Aiken's principal and contact with the Assistant Superintendent for Administration that same day, the situation was quickly resolved by an apology, assurance that the vest would not be used again, and the transfer of the boy to the another pre-school program.

Bottom Line: the system works!

In fact, the grandmother was quoted as stating that the Assistant Superintendent was fair and resolved the issue in a professional manner. So why did the Advocate feel it necessary to devote a full page to this story?

Unfortunately, since school officials rightfully declined to comment on this issue because of privacy concerns, the article also included a one-sided telling of the story and subjective comments that may or may not have been relevant to the story. As a result, I feel that the Advocate did a disservice to the teacher, to Aiken, and to special needs children and their parents. The use of a weighted vest is nothing like tying a child to a tree!

I am the proud father of three African-American boys who attend Aiken and am very pleased by Aiken's principal, teachers and staff. What a shame that the Rodriguez boy will no longer attend school there and have Ms. Sullivan as a teacher.
Posted by G Murphy on 11.2.09 at 9.21
This may work, but I would be concerned about adding weight to the kids.... compressing the back - crunching those discs that aren't used to the extra weight... It can't be good -
Posted by BackAttack on 11.4.09 at 12.49
3 year old children are wiggly, but the norms for 3 year old children to SIT and ATTEND are 15 minutes in length. If they use movement based learning where they dance and explore with their body you can increase circle time to about 20 minutes before changing to another center.

Our sensory system works like no other individual. What is embarrassing for a 21 year old young mother, does not necessarily mean its embarrassing to a 3 year old unless they learn to label it as being embarrassing.

"Tied to a tree" comment shows that the person did not EVEN take the time to learn about weighted vests, its research, and its affect on the proprioceptive system. Being tied to a tree does not support proprioceptive function, but rather limit the range you can move. A vest does not limit the range you move, but rather feels like a hug to calm a child or an adult down.

Lastly, most people go into this field to help children learn, not to inflict harm.

Posted by K P on 11.6.09 at 6.48
Fear of lawyers drove the final outcome of this story, not the kid's best interests.
Posted by fink on 11.13.09 at 19.39
Leave this field empty Name*:

Email*:

URL:

Comment:

All comments must adhere to our Terms & Conditions of Use.

Find it Here:
keyword:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

Immobilized
A pre-schooler in the West Hartford public school system is made to wear a weight vest for being too wiggly
No Sex Offenders
Greenwich ponders restricting where registered sex offenders can go
Nightmare Memory
A witness to Eugenio DeLeon Vega’s slaying says she didn’t say what she said
Cuffed in Pittsburgh
A former Army medic says police stripped him of his insignia and patches during the G-20 summit
Freegan Out
From second-hand clothes to foraging in fields to grabbing dinner out of trash bins, freegans try to take as little as possible from the consumer world
Water World
Will the new expanded bottle deposits mean more money flooding into the state? Critics doubt it.
Crime and Punishment
Round-up of local crimes
Choo Choo
Everybody loves trains … right?